Collaboration tools

Collaboration tools handle the work that happens between meetings - quick questions, file sharing, visual feedback, and async updates. The right mix depends on whether your team is remote, hybrid, or in-office, and how much async communication you want to enable.

This category is broad. Rather than buying a tool for every use case, start with what your team already uses and fill gaps only when you feel friction.

Fully remote teams need collaboration tools to replace hallway conversations. Without them, everything becomes a meeting or a long email thread.

Hybrid teams benefit from async communication even when people are in the office. Recording a Loom is faster than scheduling a call, and the recipient watches when it suits them.

Co-located teams need fewer tools but still benefit from shared password management and visual collaboration for workshops.

The more async your culture, the more you'll rely on these tools. The more synchronous, the less you need.

‍

Start with what you already have. Google Workspace covers documents, spreadsheets, slides, and basic collaboration for most teams. Microsoft 365 does the same if that's your ecosystem.

Add tools only when you feel genuine pain. Slow feedback loops? Try Loom. Messy brainstorms on Zoom? Try Miro. Passwords shared over chat? Try LastPass.

Each new tool is another place to check. Consolidate where possible.

‍

Choose tools that integrate with your existing stack. A standalone tool that doesn't connect to anything creates silos.

Consider adoption. The simplest tool that solves the problem wins. Features don't matter if the team doesn't use them.

For design collaboration, Figma is the standard. For screen recording, Loom. For whiteboarding, Miro. For chat, Slack or Microsoft Teams depending on your ecosystem.

‍

The goal is faster clearer communication, not more tools. Add collaboration tools one at a time, only when the current way of working breaks down.